ORDER S. M. ZUBAIR, J.-This is petition for special leave to appeal under section 417 (2) Cr.P.C, against the judgment and order dated 31.7.1993 of Magistrate 1st Class, Sargodha whereby he acquitted the respondent No. 2 to 7 of the charges under sections 506/500/34 PPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned trial Court has neither properly read the evidence nor critically examined and appreciated the evidence adduced by the petitioner. He has in. This respect particularly referred to the evidence of PW.3 Fateh Muhammad.
He further contended that according to the complaint the respondents levelled wild allegations against the petitioner and lowered his prestige in the eye of general public, therefore, they committed the aforementioned offences.
3. I have gone through the record of the case with the able assistance of the learned counsel. The learned trial Court while passing the impugned order has given very valid and cogent reasons and held that Fateh Muhammad PW.3 had admitted that when the people asked the respondents, then the respondents told them that they went to the house but the house was locked and inmates of the house of bride were not there. These points per-se are not sufficient to bring the complaint within the ambit of section 500 PPC. There is no allegation of intimidation. The evidence led by the petitioner is being supported by highly interested and inimical witnesses. Unless and until, there is some corroboration, this evidence cannot be believed which is lacking in this case. Nikkahkhan, the only independent witness who was present at the scene did not support the petitioner's case, hence the impugned order of acquittal is not open to any legal objection. This petition is dismissed in limine.