1. SYED MAMOON KAZI, C.J. - Admittedly the applicant was not arrested on the spot by the police while committing the alleged offence but he was arrested subsequently while, according to the allegations, one of the persons named him as one of the persons involved in commission of the crime. Although the learned trial Court in its order dated 27.2.1996 has shown the applicant as absconder, but nothing can be spelt out from the said order to suggest that any proceedings under Sections 87/88 of the Criminal Procedure Code had been initiated against the applicant. It is also pertinent to note that no identification prade appears to have been held by the police, neither any recoveries are said to have been made against the applicant. The case of the applicant, therefore, requires further inquiry. Bail is, therefore, granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety and PR Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court.