' Muhammad Hussain petitioner who is the complainant in case F.I.R. No,379/93 of Police Station Sadar Sheikhupura which case stands registered with respect to the murder of one Arshad who was a brother of the said Muhammad Hussain complainant, seeks cancellation of bail allowed to Yamin respondent through an order dated 7-12-1993 passed by this Court (my learned brother Khizar Hayat, J as his Lordship then was) in Criminal Appeal No,4235-B of 1993.
2. It is not appropriate for me to consider the submissions made by the learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner on the merits of the case as the same had been discussed in detail when the bail was allowed to Yamin respondent by this Court.
3. Other than the merits the, ground canvassed for recall of the bail is that after his release on bail, Yamin respondent had launched an attack on the complainant/petitioner on 14-12-1993 in respect of which an F.I.R. Bearing No,806/93 had been registered at Police Station Sadar Sheikhupura for the alleged commission of offences punishable under section 506/337, P.P.C.; that on 27-1-1994 Yamin respondent and his companions again harassed the complainant and other eye-witnesses of the case in question in respect of which report had been entered at the said police station on the said date and further that on 4-3-1994 both the parties, when they were present in the police station in connection with the investigation of the above-mentioned case quarrelled with each other as a result of which proceedings had been taken against the two parties under section 107/151, Cr.P.C.
4. The learned counsel for Yamin respondent submits that the above-mentioned F.I.R. No,806/93 had been found false and has since been reccommended for cancellation.
5. The concession allowed to Yamin respondent by this Court cannot be permitted to be recalled only on the basis of a report entered at the police station on the allegation that the respondent and his companions had tried to harass the eye-witnesses of the murder in question. The F.I.R. Which was lodged by the complainant with respect to some such threats and harassment has since been found false.
6. In the circumstances, I find no merit in this petition which is 18 accordingly dismissed.