' MIR HAZAR KHAN KHOSO, J.---This petition is directed against the order dated 13-6-1994 passed by the learned Chairman, N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal, Peshawar, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner before the Service Tribunal was dismissed. On 17-6-1993 neither the petitioner appeared nor his counsel. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. On 21-9-1993 an application for restoration of the appeal was moved before the Service Tribunal alongwith second application for condoning delay. The case came up for hearing before the learned Chairman, N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal on 13-6-1994. The learned Chairman dismissed the application on the ground that satisfactory explanation to justify restoration of the appeal was not given by the petitioner.
2. We have heard the petitioner in person. He was not in a position to give proper explanation for not attending the Tribunal on 17-7-1993. He also could not satisfy us as to why his counsel remained absent on the aforesaid date. We have gone through the impugned order and the daily diary maintained by the Service Tribunal. There is nothing wrong with impugned order which may require interference of this Court. Besides, it was brought to our notice that the petitioner was removed from service after due inquiry on some other charges. There is no merit in the petition which is dismissed and leave to appeal is refused accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.