This is an 4pplication filed byMuhammad Bakhsh, petitioner/ complainant, against respondents Nos. l to 6 for the cancellation of their bail granted by my learned brother Sh. Khizar Hayat, J. (as he then was) on 8-3-1994.
2. Learned counsel, for the petitioner submits that the abovementioned respondents are continuously threatening the petitioner/complainant and other prosecution witnesses after they were allowed to bail that on 17-4-1994 they made threats to the petitioner and other prosecution witnesses of dire consequences if they made statements against them in the relevant Court; that in consequence of it, the petitioner lodged a report at Police Station Chichawatni and that the above said respondents have misused the concession of bail and their bail, in view of this development, may be cancelled.
3. I have given anxious consideration to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant. Admittedly, affidavits of the witnesses, in whose presence the threats were allegedly made, have not been filed with the present application. It iswell-settled that it is hazardous to rely on reports in Roznamcha without actual proof of these facts in Court. (See Abdul Rahim v. The State and others 1987 PCr.LJ 588. Further, no medical certificate) has been placed on the file to substantiate the allegation that the petitioner and l other prosecution witnesses were injured by the above said respondents.
For the foregoing reasons, I am not inclined to cancel the bail of the abovementioned respondents and the petition is rejected.