' ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J.---Leave to appeal has been sought against the judgment of the High Court dated 4-12-1993.
2. Respondents Nos. 1 to 6 were convicted by the M.I.C. Jaranwala, District Faisalabad, under sections 468, 471, P.P.0 and sentenced to 2 years' R.I. With fine of Rs,1000, in default of payment of fine 6 months' R.I. They were further convicted under section 420, P.P.C. And sentenced to 2 years'
R.I. And Rs,500 as fine, in default thereof 2 months' R.I. Respondent No, 7, Mst. Sakina, was convicted under section 468/471 and sentenced to 2 years' S.I. With fine of Rs,1,000, in default thereof 4 months' S.I. She was further convicted under section 420, P.P.C. And sentenced to 2 years' R.I. With a fine of Rs,500 and in default thereof to undergo 2 months' S.I. The respondents' appeal against their conviction was accepted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, vide order dated 31-10-1984. The petitioner challenged the respondents' acquittal in the High Court, but the learned Judge. In Chamber maintained the order. The High Court dismissed the revision petition for the following reasons:-- "However, learned counsel for the petitioner having gone through the entire evidence could not dislodge the findings. Consequently the petition being devoid of any substance is hereby dismissed."
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned Judge in Chamber has not discussed the evidence and has not passed a speaking order. There is sufficient evidence on the record on the basis of which the conviction of the respondents is recorded by the trial Court.
4. Leave is granted.