1. ' Applicant Haji Ghulam Hussain is arrested in Crime No,24/94 under section 324, P.P.C. As amended read with section 34 of P.P.C. The F.I.R. About the incident was lodged by Hafiz Shah Muhammad on 18-2-1994. A bail application moved on behalf of the applicant before the trial Court of I-Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhkot is dismissed by order, dated 13-4-1994.
2. ' The allegation against the applicant is that he caused hatchet injuries on the face and shoulder of P.W. Muhammad Bux which injuries are certified to be grievous, as pointed out by the learned Advocate appearing .For the State.
3. ' I have heard the learned counsel and perused the record. The contentions raised by the applicant's learned Advocate are that the ocular testimony is in conflict with the medical evidence, that the injuries are not described as dangerous, that the police was inimical to the applicant and lastly that because some of the co-accused have been granted bail, the applicant's case requires further enquiry and he would also be entitled to bail. Mr. Dayo has referred to a number of precedents in support of his contentions. The learned Advocate appearing for the State has opposed this application and has argued that specific role of being armed with hatchet and causing injuries to Muhammad Bux is attributed to him.
4. The applicant is not only named in F.I.R, which is lodged promptly, but he is also attributed the role of causing injuries to P.W. Muhammad Bux. There is no conflict between medical and ocular testimony nor the case of applicant is at par with the case of co-accused whom bail is granted.
5. The precedents referred by applicant's learned Advocate are distinguishable and do not advance the case of applicant. There is no merit in this application and the same is accordingly dismissed.