' ZIA MEHMOOD MIRZA, J.---This is a petition for leave to appeal filed by the Federation of Pakistan and two other functionaries against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 27-3-1994 allowing the appeal of the respondent Abdul Rashid with the direction that "the department shall forward the case of the appellant to appropriate authority Central Selection Board within next two months for consideration for promotion as Director-General (BPS-20) on merits-cum-seniority, who is otherwise eligible for promoting as Director-General (BPS-20) under the rules".
2. Facts necessary for the disposal of this petition, briefly stated, are that the respondent Abdul Rashid was initially appointed as Statistical Investigator in the Federal Bureau of Statistics on 1-1- 1960. In due course of time he raise to the rank of Director, Data Processing in (BPS-19) on 27-2-1974 and was later transferred to and posted as Director in the Directorate-General of Registration on 1- 3-1977, where he reached the maximum of BPS-20 by move-over.
3. According to the Recruitment Rules issued vide Ministry of Interior Notification dated 2-4-1989 the post of Director-General (BPS-20) in the Directorate-General of Registration was to be filled in 100% by promotion from amongst the Directors (B-19) and failing that either by initial appointment or by transfer.
' It appears that without considering the case of the respondent for promotion to the post of Director-General, an officer from Police Service of Pakistan was brought in and appointed as Director-General. Feeling aggrieved, the respondent after exhausting the departmental remedy preferred an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal claiming that he was eligible for promotion to the post of Director-General as he possessed the requisite qualification and experience prescribed for the post but the appointing authority without even considering him for promotion appointed an officer from outside as Director-General. The precise prayer of the respondent was that he "may be considered for promotion to the post of Director-General, Registration (BPS-20) as per provisions contained in the notification dated 2-4-1989 which embodies the terms and conditions of service. In case he is approved for such promotion by the Selection Board and the competent Authority, then the officer holding the post of Director-General, Registration may be withdrawn and repatriated to Police Service of Pakistan".
' The Service Tribunal accepting the contention of the respondent allowed his appeal with the directions aforementioned vide judgment dated 27-3-1984.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have also perused the impugned judgment of the Service Tribunal and the Notification, dated 2nd April, 1989 laying down the method of appointment to various posts in the Directorate-General of Registration including the post of Director-General. According to this Notification, the post of Director-General (BPS-20) was to be filled by promotion and failing promotion, the post "shall be filled in by initial appointment and failing that by transfer". The Notification quite clearly lays down that the post of Director- General in the first instance is to be filled by promotion and resort to other methods of recruitment namely the direct appointment and induction of an outsider by transfer can only be made if no officer in the department is eligible and qualified for promotion. It is not the case of petitioner that the respondent was not eligible for promotion to the post of Director-General. That being so, was not open to the Government to induct any officer from outside by means of transfer without first considering the respondent for promotion to the post in question which admittedly was not done.
5. In the circumstances, the impugned judgment of the Service Tribunal directing the Department concerned to place the case of the respondent before the appropriate authority Selection Board for reconsideration for promotion is not open to any exception. Even otherwise, the case does not involve any substantial question of law of public importance warranting grant of leave to appeal.
This petition is, therefore, dismissed.