ORDER SHAFI MOHAMMADI, J.- Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was granted concession of bail on 5-12-1993 in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- but the applicant on account of his poverty, was not able to arrange this heavy surety amount with the result that he is still in jail since 22-P1.1991.
2. Although, the amount of surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lac only in the case u/s 302/307/34 is not heavy as contended by the learned counsel, yet the learned A A.G has no objection if the surety amount is reduced from Rs. 1 lac to Rs.50,000/-.
3. In the circumstances, the amount of surety is reduced from Rs. One lac to Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only).
4. It is, however, made clear that this order has been passed in the light of the circumstances explained by the learned counsel for the applicant, there should not be treated as a precedent for each and every case. It is also pointed out that the trial Court should duty satisfy itself about the solvency of the surety and if the accused absconds, than the surety would have no right to move application under section 514 Cr. PC which has become a routine in the present days.
5. With these observations and modifications, Cr. Misc No.43I/94 stands disposed of.