1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was granted concession of bail on 5- 12-1993 in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 ,but the applicant on account of his poverty, was not able to arrange this heavy surety amount with the result that he is still in jail since 2271-1991.
2. Although, the amount of surety m the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rs. One lac only) in the case under section 302/307/34 is not heavy as contended by the learned counsel, yet the learned AA.-G. Has no objection if the surety amount is reduced from Rs. 1 lac to Rs.50,000.
3. It is, however, made clear that this order has been passed in the light of the circumstances explained by the learned counsel for the applicant, therefore, it should not be treated as a precedent for each and every case. It is also pointed out that the trial Court should duly satisfy itself about the solvency of the surety and if the accused absconds, then the surety would have no right to move application under section 514, Cr.P.C. Which has become a routine in the present days.
4. With these observations and modifications, Criminal Miscellaneous No.431 of 1994 stands disposed of.
5. N.H.Q./F-233/K Surety amount reduced. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.