' NASIM HASAN SHAH, C.J.---The petitioner alongwith another (Sajid son of Fazal Ahmed) is being tried for inflicting Churri blows to Fazalur Rehman complainant under section 324/34, P.P.C. Both had applied for bail during the pendency of the trial which was granted by a learned Magistrate on 16-9-1993. However, on the application of the complainant the bail of the petitioner (Fazal Ahmad) was cancelled while that of his co-accused namely Sajid was maintained. Fazal Ahmad thereupon moved the High Court for reversal of the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge but the High Court vide its well-reasoned order dated 12-2-1994 held that the petitioner was not entitled to bail and dismissed his application. Hence this petition for leave to, appeal.
2. We have heard Malik Rab Nawaz Noon, Advocate. The question whether an undertrial prisoner is entitled to bail or not is in the discretionary jurisdiction of the Courts below. The learned Additional Sessions Judge and the High Court after giving proper reasons have found that the petitioner is not entitled to bail, on account of the serious injuries inflicted by him on the complainant. The learned counsel for the petitioner has been unable to show that the finding of the learned Court just mentioned, suffered from any legal infirmity. No ground for interference with such an order is, therefore, warranted. However, we feel that this is a case in which the trial of the accused should be expedited and we direct accordingly.
3. This petition with the above observations stands dismissed.