1. ORDER RAJA AFRASTAB KHAN, J.- Through this constitution petition, the petitioner, Ahmad Khan, has challenged the validity of order dated 14.2.1994 passed by the learned Special Court No.3 (Suppression of Terrorists Activities), Lahore, holding that the case in hand was not triable by him.
2. Alternatively, it is prayed that this petition may be treated as a revision petition and accordingly a direction may be issued to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura, to decide the complaint of the petitioner on merits, by setting aside the order dated 19.7.1994. The learned State counsel has no objection to the grant of second prayer made by the learned counsel. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura, vide his order dated 19.7.1994 clearly observed that he had no jurisdiction because the offence committed by the accused was scheduled one. It was noted that the learned Special Court constituted under the Suppression of Terrorists Activities Act, 1975, was th| only competent forum to entertain and decide the aforesaid complaint. This being so, the only appropriate course open to the learned Additional Sessions Judge was-to have sent the case to the learned competent court for its trial. It is established that one of the accused, namely, Muhammad Amin was armed with a Kalashnikov during the incident. This fact was not disputed by the learned Law Officer. In other words, in the given facts and circumstances, the learned Additional Sessions Judge was right to hold that the learned Special Court, constituted under the provisions of Suppression of Terrorists Activities Act, 1975, was the only compete- m court to try this scheduled offence. He, however, was not competent to dispose of the matter. He should have sent back the case for its trial to the learned competent court. The order dated 19.7.1994 stands modified to that extent. The order dated 14.2.1994, passed by the learned Special Court shall be deemed to have been recalled in the interest of justice, in consequence, the complaint case and the challan case would be sent to the learned Special Court (Suppression of Terrorists Activities), Lahore, for their trial in accordance with law. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of.
3. RAJA AFRAS1AB KHAN AND MRS. FAKHAR-UN-NISA KHOKKAR, JJ.-It is contended by the learned counsel that the learned Judge Special Court was competent to try the case in hand because one of the accused was armed with a Kalashankov. The point raised needs consideration; The petition is admitted. Notice shall issue to the respondents for 31.8.1994. The proceedings shall remain stayed inn the meanwhile.