DECISION The applicant was dismissed by the respondents from service in 1987. He had filed a petition before the Labour Court and the same came to be allowed but without back benefits. The respondents had come in appeal before this Tribunal and the appeal was allowed. The appeal which was filed by the applicant against the denial of the back benefits also came to be dismissed.
2. The matter was then taken to the High Court in a writ petition and the applicant's writ petition was allowed but again without back benefits.
3. It was thereafter that he had filed a complaint for being deprived of various benefits accruing to him which entailed the breach of the terms of the settlement entered into between the CBA and the management.
4. At the stage when the process had not been issued, all that was to be seen was whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case which merited consideration. The question of evaluating his statement was not warranted That was to be undertaken after the parties had led evidence. The order is unsustainable.
5. As a result the Revision application is allowed and the matter will go back to the learned Presiding Officer for disposal in accordance with law. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.