' JUSTICE SH. MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR (MEMBER).---The respondents herein, namely, Azmatullah, Inamullah, Mahmood Ahmad and Muhammad Hanif, alongwith Irfanullah, were tried under sections 302/34,. 302/109 and 337-F/34 (on two counts), P.P.C. By the learned Judge, Special Court for Speedy Trials No,II, Lahore. The learned Judge vide his judgment dated 13-3-1993, acquitted the respondents of the charge, whereas Irfanullah was convicted. He has challenged his conviction through a separate appeal. The State has challenged the acquittal of the respondents through the present appeal.
2. The learned Law Officer appearing in support of this appeal has vehemently contended that the learned trial Judge on erroneous misapplication of law as well as misappreciation of evidence, has acquitted the respondents which has resulted into grave miscarriage of justice.
3. We have heard the learned Law Officer at length, perused the record minutely and have gone through the reasoqs advanced by the learned Judge while acquitting the respondents. The allegation against the respondents is that four days prior to the occurrence, they conspired to commit the murder of Abdul Sattar alias Bawa. We find that there is no evidence on the record to connect the respondents with the offence of conspiracy; hence the learned trial Judge rightly acquitted them and the reasons advanced by the learned Judge do not call for any interference.
Resultantly, we fmd no force in this State appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.