' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J. ---The petitioners seek review of our judgment dated 11-10-1992. This review petition has been moved on the assumption that the power of Attorney and the Agreement to sell related not to a specified area but to the claim and the verified units against which that area was allotted. On this assumption it is contended that any variation in the Units and its enhancement must benefit the petitioners rather than the vendor or the Principal.
2. This assumption has been not made the basis for judgment at all. On the contrary, as the two documents show, the area which was the subject-matter had been specified and the demand cannot be extended by any inferential process to, the Claim on the basis of which that area had been allotted or its entitlement determined.
3. No case is made out for review of our judgment and the Review Petition is dismissed. Review dismissed