' SALEEM AKHTAR, J.---The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the order of the learned Judge in Chambers of the High Court whereby bail application filed on their behalf has been dismissed.
2. The petitioners have been accused of offences under sections 302, 452, 148, 149 and 109, P.P.C.
They are alleged to have formed an unlawful assembly and participated in the occurrence resulting in the death of Muhammad Arshad and Riasat. On the day of incident Muhammad Anwar, Muhammad Younus, Haji Muhammad, Mehdi, Fazal Hussain and Riaz armed with 12 bore guns came towards the fields of deceased Riasat and Muhammad Arshad. Both of them along with Muhammad Shabbir and Rehmat ran away and entered into the house of Riasat. The accused chased them and entered into the house and fired. In the FIR specific role has been assigned to both the petitioners. Mst. Zainab Bibi is an eye-witness as she was present in the house at the time of commission of offence. One of the accused, namely, Mehdi is the brother of Muhammad Arshad and Riasat and had disputes about the land. The motive alleged is that he wanted to do away with the deceased in order to get the entire land of his father. While rejecting the bail application the learned Judge observed as follows:- "The Court has given its anxious considerations to the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties. The present petitioners are specifically accused of having caused firearm injuries to the two deceased, as stated above, after having chased them into the house where they were killed and there is an eye-witness of the occurrence in question through the testimony of Mst. Zainab Bibi.
' Therefore, it cannot be said that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioners have not committed the offences alleged."
3. The discretion has properly and legally been exercised by the learned Judge and we find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed.