' A case under section 324/382/148/149/109, P.P.C. Was registered against Muhammad Saeed and others with Police Station Bhera, District Sargodha, vide F.I.R. No,100 of 1993 dated 19-7-1993. On 27- 3-1994, learned counsel did not press the petition to the extent of Atta Ullah, and as such it was dismissed as withdrawn to that extent. Nevertheless, he pressed the petition for grant of bail to Muhammad Saeed. The allegation against the petitioner, Muhammad Saeed, is that he held the complainant, Ehsan-ur-Rehman in his clasp and his co-accused, Atta Ullah fired and injured his left knee. It is contended that admittedly, the petitioner was not armed. He did not do any overt act in the incident in hand. In these circumstances, the bail petition has not been opposed by the learned Law Officer and the State counsel.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record carefully.
The question whether or not the petitioner, Muhammad Saeed held the complainant in his clasp had to be determined by the learned trial Court after recording the evidence of the parties. This is, undoubtedly, a case of further inquiry inasmuch as no overt act was attributed to the petitioner.
This being so, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Bhalwal, District Sargodha. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.