SAJJAD AHMAD SIPRA, J. -The petitioner is one of. The accused in a case registered vide F.I.R. No. 101/93 under sections 10/11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 at Police Station, Factory Area, Faisalabad.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the State were heard in respect of the contentions raised herein. It was confirmed on behalf of the State that as contended herein, the petitioner and the alleged abductee had entered into a nikah though the case of the prosecution was that it was done forcibly. It was s one of the accused in a case registered vide F.I.R. No. 101/93 under sections 10/11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 at Police Station, Factory Area, Faisalabad.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the State were heard in respect ot the contentions raised herein. It was confirmed on behalf of the State that as contended herein, the petitioner and the alleged abductee had entered into a nikah though the case of the prosecution was that it was done forcibly. It was ed upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it was further confirmed on behalf of the State that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal and is no longer required by the police, and has been in judicial custody for over ten months.
3. Therefore, in view of what has been stated above, the petitioner is hereby allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Faisalabad.