' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J. ---The petitioner who is the plaintiff/preemptor, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court dated 4-3-1992 whereby the claim of the plaintiff was dismissed on grounds of waiver and estoppel.
2. The petition is shown to be barred by 21 days. The explanation given in the application for condonation of delay is as hereunder:-- "That the petitioner in the company of one Hafiz Javaid Iqbal went to contact a local lawyer Mr. Muhammad Rafiq Rijwana at Multan who has sufficient standing at the Bar as to the limitation for filing petition for leave to appeal when the time of 60 days has not yet expired.
(c) That he was told that the requisite time for filing the petition for leave to appeal is 90 days.
(d) That it was much before the expiry of those 90 days that he went to the present counsel on 18- 7-1992 at Multan to engage him for filing the same. It turned out that the limitation was 60 days for filing the petition for leave to appeal."
No supporting affidavit of the Advocate has been filed. Without it condonation is not possible.
3. Even on merits, we find that the High Court has given cogent reasons for interfering with a finding of fact and that does not require our interference.
4. In the circumstances, leave to appeal is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.