FALAK SHER, J.- This order will dispose of Criminal Revision Nos. 336 and 335 of 1993 having commonalty of facts and law viz., the petitioner having been tried by the Judicial Magistrate, Khushab in the case registered vide FIR No.41 of 12.5.1989 u/s 307/109 PPC at police station Gunjial, District Khushab for causation of gun shot injuries to the complainant Fateh Sher PW1's son Muhammad Sher injured PW2 conjunctively with Muhammad Khan son of Ahmad Khan and Mst.
Maamoor Khatoon respectively father-in-law and wife of the injured on the preceding evening endoute to his inlaws' place for fetching the estranged wife, with a view to avenging the reprimanded restraint from pursuing illict liaison with the latter as well as in the case registered vide FIR No.45 of 7.5.1989 u/s 13 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 for recovery of the crime weapon viz., 12 bore gun, culminating into co-accused's acquittal and his conviction and sentence u/s 307 PPC to three years R.I. With a i.e of Rs. 2,000/- in default to serve further two months R.I. In addition to payment of Rs. 10,000/- compensation to the injured u/s 544-A Cr.P.C, or to serve another term of 6 months R.I. Availing the benefit contemplated by section 382-8 Cr.P.C, and, u/s 13 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 to one year R.I. With a i.e of Rs. 2,000/-or in default to serve three months R.I. Respectively through separate judgments dated 18-1-1993, inter alia, placing reliance on the ocular account furnished by Muhammad Sher injured- PW2, his father the complainant Fateh Sher PW1, latter's cousin Munshi Khan PW6 and the medical evidence tendered by Dr. Pirzada Syed Muhammad Alam Shah PW8 observing; (medicolegal report Ex.PA)
"1. A firearm lacerated wound 4 "X 3" on the back ulnar side of left had. The skin, muscles, vessels, and left 3rd, 4th, 5th, metacarpal bones smashed and damaged badly, tendens also damage and exposed.
2. Six firearm lacerated wounds of entry each measuring 1/4" x 1/3" x deep into left front of abdomen and lower side of chest in a group in a area of 2" x 1 and 1 " from the mid line."
Assailed legality thereof in appeal before the Sessions Court vide Criminal Appeals No. 6 and 9 of 1993 respectively while the complainant availing the remedy of revision sought enhancement of the petitioner's sentence on the former count.
2. The learned Addl Sessions Judge seized of the matter, dismissing the petitioner's ing the complainant's revision enhanced the sentence on the former count to 7 years R.I. Through separate judgments dated 20.6.1993.
3. Feeling discontented therewith present petitions have been recoursed, during the course of hearing whereof learned counsel couldn't dislodge the concurrent findings of guilt recorded by the two courts below being fully borne out from the record thus are unexceptionable; however, as a matter of abundant clarification, it may be observed that the awarded sentences would run concurrently and that in lieu of failure to pay up compensation would be simple within the contemplation of section 544-A of the Cr.P.C, in addition to availing the benefit contemplated by section 382-B ibid. Accordingly, the revision petitions are disposed of.