' The occurrence admittedly took place and that too on a very large scale at 7-30 a.m. On 13-4- 1992. Maqsood Ahmad is the lodger of F.I.R. No,104/92 on the same day at 9-30 a.m.
2. The counter-version was given by Anjum Pervaiz son of Muhammad Irshad, petitioner firstly on 16-4-1992 and then a little improved versions to say on 13-8-1992.
3. Muhammad Irshad and Muhammad Arshad petitioners according to F.I.R. Lodged by Maqsood Ahmad were armed with Sotas and so were their two co-accused Zafar Alam and Abdul Sattar and they caused injuries to Noor Muhammad P.W. Noor Muhammad is having only five blunt weapon injuries out of which only one is grievous. For five injuries four accused have been roped in.
4. Yasin petitioner (Criminal Miscellaneous No,3619/B of 1993) is alleged to have fired his gun hitting Anjum Pervaiz in the leg and as a result thereof the same has now been amputated.
5. In this view of the matter both the bail petitions are being taken up together.
6. As already observed, there is evidence collected by the police implicating Yasin petitioner as well as the present petitioners in the occurrence but the contention of the learned counsel for Muhammad Irshad petitioner is correct to the extent that for causing five blunt weapon injuries the net has been cast too wide. Muhammad Irshad petitioner is aged about 55 years and his son Anjum Pervaiz was seriously injured with the amputation of the leg A with three others, namely Zafar Alam, Arshad petitioner and Abdul Sattar co-accused. Young fellows armed with Sotas were present, they could very well have caused five injuries to Noor Muhammad. In this view of the matter only Irshad petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs,50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The bail petitions on behalf of Muhammad Arshad and Muhammad Yasin, petitioners are dismissed.