1. Through this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the alleged harassm ent being caused to the petitioner by issuing him charge-sheet/s has been challenged and the following prayers have been made by him:-- "In the light of the above submission of law and facts, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that respondents Nos. 3 to 6 may kindly be directed to desist from causing harassment to the petitioner and withdraw the charge-sheets, referred to above (Annexures `L', `M' and `O'), declaring illegal and unlawful.
2. It is further prayed that the respondent No. 4 may please be ordered to declare the petitioner as successful candidate accordingly, after giving him the average marks, under the relevant Rules.
3. Moreover, appropriate legal notice/action may please be taken against the respondents Nos.4 to 6, by registering a criminal case against them.
4. Any other appropriate relief to which the petitioner may be found entitled and deem fit by this Honourable Court, may also be granted to the petitioner, and against the respondents Nos. 3 to 6, to meet the ends of justice.
5. Costs of this petition may also be awarded to the petitioner."
6. According to the petitioner, the issuance of charge-sheets, copies whereof are available at Annexes I--- M and O respectively dated 8-5-1993, 10-5-1993 and 25-5-1993, are the result of mala fides in that he was responsible for unearthing the discriminatory tre4tment meted out to him by the authorities of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore by making interpolations in the record to justify the absence of the petitioner while taking F.Sc. 1st Annual 1992; Examination' in Chemistry Paper-A under Roll No. 2283. The last order dated 25-5-1993 issued by Office Superintendent (Secrecy Discipline) for Controller of Examinations to the petitioner vide No. X389-S.D.III reads as under:-- The petitioner is said to have replied to all the communications dated 8-5-1993, 10-5-1993 and 25- 5-1993 by stating that the allegations therein are not based upon facts, are incorrect and have been held to be so by Mr. Badarul Islam, Member (Enquiries)-I, S&GAD on 3-11-1992.
2. When the learned counsel was asked to indicate the issuance or otherwise of any order by the respondent-authorities after the receipt of the reply by the petitioner dated 27-5-1993, copy whereof is available at Annexure `P' to this petition, he submitted that initiation of action against the petitioner is tainted with mala fides and for that reason alone this Court can issue a writ/order in the nature of certiorari under Article 199 of the Constitution. I am afraid the contention has little merit in the context of the accrual of any cause in favour of the petitioner at this stage, to lay a challenge to the issuance of charge-sheets against him. It is not the case of the petitioner that the respondent-authorities have finalised the consideration of his case at their level without considering his reply/replies to the charges levelled against him. Even the replies of the petitioner are conspicuously silent about any mala fides on the part of the respondent-authorities in issuing the charge-sheets to him. Be that as it may, in the matter of disposal of petitioner's case at more than one levels in the offices of the respondent-Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education.
7. He will have the chance: to put forward his case before the competent authorities and it would be thereafter that he will be possessed of any right to lay a challenge here on available grounds. This petition has been filed at too premature a stage to qualify for consideration at this juncture. The same is dismissed in limine.