' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---Review of our judgment dated 23-6-1993 is sought on the grounds that the admission attributed to Mst. Rakhi could not be set aside in Constitutional jurisdiction. Besides, the judgment may impede the petitioners even in the matter of seeking lawful reduction in the allotment of Mst. Rakhi which was, according to the learned counsel,, admittedly in excess of her entitlement.
2. The first ground concerns the merits already considered. The second is misconceived, because the impugned judgment deals with the validity of the admission and the orders passed thereafter.
3. No ground for review made out. Dismissed.