' SALEEM AKHTAR, J.---The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the learned Judge in Chambers whereby the Constitution petition filed by her was dismissed.
2. The dispute relates to property bearing Khasra No, 2175 situate Chah Anguriwala, Mouza Taraf Ismail measuring 1 Kanal 17 Marlas. According to the petitioner this land was treated as agricultural land and was allotted to her on 18-3-1965 in lieu of verified claim. It was recorded as Chahi Nehri in Jamabandi 1943-44 and 1948-49 and onward up to 1960. In order to show her possession she had stated that one Allah Ditta was cultivating the land as tenant and thereafter the Municipal Committee, Multan took it on lease and was paying rent to the petitioner in respect of 14 Marlas of land. It seems that on 16-2-1965 PTO was issued in respect of an area measuring 415 square yards out of the land allotted to the petitioner in favour of respondent No, 1 treating it to be urban immovable property. The petitioner filed appeal and revision before the Settlement Authorities, which were dismissed and finally she filed Constitution petition which was also dismissed by the impugned judgment.
3. The learned counsel has contended that the disposal of the property as urban property in 1963 in favour of respondent No, 1 and the observation that the petitioner had failed to produce any record or copy of special Jamabandi to support that the land was agricultural land or that it was treated as an A agricultural land is a result of misreading of evidence on record. The learned counsel has referred to the petition filed in the High Court and also to Annexures A and B2 to demonstrate that the copies of required revenue records including Jamabandi were annexed with the petition. The learned counsel contended that the evidence produced on record has not been considered. Leave is granted.