Pakistan Case Law← Search
1994 SCMR 113

Miss YASMIN KHAN and anothers vs ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and another

Citation1994 SCMR 113
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Constitutional Petition No. 26 of 1993
Date1993-10-04
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Ajmal Mian, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, Shafi-ur-
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---The two petitioners have by recourse to Article 184 (3) read with Articles 199 and 187 (1), 189 and 190 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan sought enrolment as voter, so as to enable them to participate in the process of election for choosing the members of the National Assembly and the Provincial Assemblies.

2. Their case in a nutshell is that they are permanent residents of Pakistan and happen to be abroad earning their livelihood. They hold Pakistani Passports. They possess National Identity Cards. Their ordinary place of residence is outside the territories of Pakistan. They are being refused registration as voters under section 7 of the Electoral Rolls Act, 1974 and for that reason are unable to exercise their right of vote. Their contention is that the Constitution by Article 51 grants them the right to have their names on the Electoral Roll of the territory shown as their permanent residence/address and further arrangements have to be made in the Electoral Rolls for the effective exercise of their right of franchise while they happen to be outside the country. At present, according to the petitioners, even if the names appear on the Electoral Roll there is no arrangement in existence for the exercise of vote by such recorded voters while they are residing abroad. They are necessarily required to come back and exercise the right to vote in the constituency where they are entered in the voters list.

3. It appeared during the course of hearing, that the petitioners have not themselves made any effort to get themselves enrolled as voters on the strength of documents and material in their power or possession. Nevertheless, as 'even the recorded voters living abroad are not in a position, at present, to exercise the right of vote, there is indeed an impediment in the exercise of right of franchise even of those who are so enrolled.

4. We consider that the Constitutional implication of such denials needs proper examination in depth. As the grievance is continuing one and not confined to any particular election, in any case not to the one currently being held, we admit this petition to regular hearing. Notice to issue to all concerned in the matter.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search