1. ORDER The above cited five appeals have been preferred against orders dated 12-5-75 and 5-6-75 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Junior Labour Court, Rawalpindi on petitions under section 25-A of the I. R. O. 1969 for re-instatement of the respondents. Petitions were accepted, hence these appeals. In first three appeals, respondents were given notices but in the last two appeals, respondents were not summoned. As a common question of lav and fact is involved in all the five appeals, I have therefore proposed to dispose them off by one order. I have heard the learned counsel of both the parties at length and have gone through the record of the Junior Labour Court as well as the impugned order. Brief facts giving rise to these appeals are that respondents were conductors in the appellant concern. Raiding Magistrate of the appellant con- Crescent Tcxtile Mills Ltd. v. Sakina Bibi (Af. Jamil Asghar, Appellate Tribunal) concern found them guilty in summary proceedings. They were fined at the spot for committing fraud by misappropriating Government revenue through fraudulent means while en route. On the basis of this punishment, their services were terminated under Standing Order 12(3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. Their petititions were accepted by the learned Presiding Officer, Junior Labour Court and they were re-instated. The learned counsel for the appellant has urged that as the respondents were foun revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.