ORDERIJAZ NISAR, J.- This is a petition under section 561-A Cr.P.C, for the quash ment of proceedings in the complaint case filed by Mst. Rozina Shaheen respondent against Bashir Ahmad etc. Petitioners in the court of Mr. Zulfiqar Ahmad Ghumman, M.I.C.,Lahore Cantt. Under section 403 PPC.
2. The relevant facts arc that Mst. Roozina Shaheen filed a complaint against her husband Bashir Ahmad and his parents that they had misappropriated her dowry articles after she was turned out by Bashir Ahmad from his house. After recording the preliminary evidence, the learned trial Magistrate summoned the petitioners to face trial under section 403 PPC vide order dated 19.12.1992.
3. Lt is contended that the. Complaint is based on frivolous allegations and is outcome of civil litigation pending between the parties and further that marriage between Bashir-Ahmad petitioner and Mst. Rozina Shaheen respondent still exists.
4. The respondent has contested the petition and stated that the suit for maintenance has been decided in favour of the respondent while suits for the recovery of dower and custody of the minor child are still pending between the parties.
5. A similar question had come out for consideration in the ease titled Gasper Pericra Vs. Mrs. Jennifer Periera and another (1977 P.Cr.L.J.307) and the High Court had held that (the mere fact that parties stand in relationship of husband and wife, would not mean that neither of them under any circumstance cannot misappropriate property exclusively belonging to other) and petitioner for quash ment was disallowed. In the instant case, the respondent is yet to lead evidence in support of her version and she cannot be deprived of this opportunity merely because suits for dower and custody of minor arc pending between the parties. Finding no substance in the petition, I dismiss it.