This writ petition is directed against the order, dated 8-6-1992, by which a learned Rent Controller at Lahore dismissed the application of the petitioner for staying the ex parte ejectment order passed against him in respect of the disputed property on the eviction application moved by respondent No.2, after entertaining petitioner's application for setting aside the ex parte ejectment order and taking proceedings thereon.
2.Once the learned Rent Controller had entertained the application of the petitioner for setting aside the ex parte ejectment order and had proceeded to decide it on merits after recording the evidence of the parties, as a necessary corollary thereof he should have stayed the execution of the ex parte ejectment order but he turned down the request of the petitioner arbitrarily. However, the, petitioner has not suffered on account of refusal of the stay order because, as pointed out by the learned counsel for respondent No.2; on petitioner's appeal against the ex parte ejectment order passed by the learned Rent Controller, the operation of that order has been suspended by the learned Additional District Judge in whose court the appeal is even now pending.
3. This being so, the filing of this writ petition by the petitioner against any future apprehension is uncalled for and the same is dismissed in limine as premature. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.