FALAK SHER, J.- Bail was sought in the case registered vide FIR No. 270 of 20.7.1992 under sections 377/109 PPC read with section l2 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 at Police Station Tandlianwala, District Faisalabad around 2.00 p.m., alleging subjection to carnal knowledge against the order of nature the complainant's minor son Saeed Ahmad aged 16 years by the petitioner, a police Constable, taking the victim to his quarters at pistol point an hour ago.
2. Contending exoneration of the petitioner by the complainant and the victim through sworn affidavits and with the submission of Challan is no more required by the investigating agency on which count he has already suffered incarceration for more than a year.
3. To which I am not favourably inclined because not only veracity of the alleged affidavits ex facie seem to have been extracted since as per impugned order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Samundri dated 1.11.1993 turning down petitioner's bail application, the victim has withdrawn his affidavit, warrants scrutiny at the trial but also neither the complainant nor the victim had any recorded motive to falsely implicate the petitioner whose stance stands corroborated by the medical evidence prima facie constitute reasonable grounds for believing petitioner's involvement in the offence charged falling within the prohibition contemplated by section 497(1) Cr.P.C, renders his disentitled to the sought for concession.
Conversely the interest of justice would seem to be better served if the case is expeditiously concluded.
Consequently, declining bail the learned trial Court seized of the matter is required to finalize the proceedings with expeditious despatch.