KHALID PAUL KHWAJA, J.- On 53.1994 at P.S, Rajanna, Toba Tek Singh a case u/s 10 and I6 of the offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 was registered against Mst. Parveen, Sarfraz, Mst. Mehran and Mst. Bhag Bharri at the instance of Noor Mohammad, respondent No. 2.
The complainant alleged that Mst. Parveen, petitioner was his legally wedded wife who had been abducted by Iftikhar Ahmad with the help of his co-accused for the purpose of committing zina with her.
2. The petitioner has moved the instant petition for the quashment of the said F.I.R u/s 561-A, Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2 and have also heard Lai Hussain Shah, S.I/Addl: SHO, Police Station Rajanna who has brought the record.
4. The petitioner asserts that she had not been abducted by any one and that as she had instituted a suit for dissolution of marriage against respondent No.2, he had falsely implicated her in the present case. Learned counsel, however, submitted that he would be satisfied if the petitioner is granted bail before arrest during the pendency of the case in question. The case has been registered against the petitioner, she therefore, should go to the concerned Sessions Court for her pre arrest bail. In order to enable her to do so she is admitted to interim bail before arrest in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C/Illaqa Magistrate, T.T. Singh for 10 days.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner when confronted with the question if the present petition was competent u/s 561-A, Cr.P.C, sought permission to withdraw the same. He is allowed to do so. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.