' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---The petitioners seek review of judgment dated 25-1-1993 on the sole ground that a grantee of resumed land cannot defeat the pre-emption claim of the petitioners for the following reasons:--
(i) Such a grantee cannot qualify as an owner;
(ii) The grant was conditional, made on 23-5-1975, m-ich after the preempted sale and the institution of pre-emption suit;
(iii) The Record of Rights still shows the State as the owner of the land and not the grantee.
2. The Court considered the main grounds (i) and (iii) in the impugned judgment as hereunder:-- "This shows that grant is total and complete. No doubt, it is subject to certain conditions like non- alienation, proper cultivation etc. And for non-observance liable to resumption, yet there are like "restrictive tovenants", as a plot of land given in a residential area not to be used for commercial purposes etc. Restrictive covenants attached to a transfer of land either by grant or sale do not detract from the ownership of the land."
3. As regards the second ground, it is not disputed that the pre-emptors in order to succeed have to maintain their superiority up to the date of decree.
4. No law to the contrary has been cited for questioning the law laid down in -the impugned judgment. Rehearing is not within the scope of review.
5. No ground is made out., Review petition, is, therefore, dismissed.