' The allegations regarding harassm ent being caused to the petitioner and/or her in-laws by the respondent-Station House Officer, Police Station Jaranwala have been denied by the latter in his report received in the office as far back as on 8-12-1992. It was specifically mentioned against para.7 of the writ petition that no case stands registered against the petitioner or her in-laws and that no complaint was then pending at the police station.
2. It has been argued that a case was subsequently registered at the instance of Muhammad Boota, brother of Safia Naureen petitioner at Police Station Jaranwala under section 380, P.P.C. And that the accused mentioned in the said case are on bail. The in-laws of the petitioner filed a petition bearing W.P. No,15 of 1993 which was disposed of on 4-1-1993 with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Faisalabad to assign the investigation to some other. Agency. The contention is that all these proceedings were the result of the connivance of petitioner's father and brother with the respondent-Station House Officer who fell prey to their desire to snap the marital tie between the petitioner and her husband, Muhammad Nadeem. It is however, not denied that the case under section 380, P.P.C. Was registered on 25-12-1992 and allegations therein that the occurrence took place one and a half months prior to the said date, are being investigated by the concerned quarters after the Superintendent of Police, Faisalabad, was directed by this Court in Writ Petition No,15 of 1993 on the petition of the accused therein.
3. That being the position, neither the report submitted by the respondent-Station House Officer is found to be incorrect nor this Court can go into the allegations presently made by the petitioner to the effect that the registration of case F.I.R. No,774 dated 24-12-1992 at Police Station Jaranwala under section 380, P.P.C. At the instance of the petitioner's brother, is mala fide. The petitioner or, for that matter, any other person interested in the prosecution of that case on behalf of the defence at investigation stage, is at liberty to put forward the defence plea before the concerned quarters.
With the above observation, this petition is dismissed in limine.