1. ' This application has been moved by Mr. Muhammad Nazar Khan, Advocate, in order to place on record some relevant documents including a Letter written by D.H. To the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court for the registration of his claim on the basis of the decree passed by this Court. Alongwith this application a photo copy of the said letter has been attached. The plaintiff/decree-holder admits that this letter was written by him to the Chief Justice, Lahore High Court. Mr. Nazar Khan states that on this letter the claim of the decree-holder has been registered to the extent of Rs,1,16,500 which is the principal amount outstanding in the accounts of the J.D.
2. Company to the plaintiff amount lying with the J.D. At the time of filing the suit by him was Rs,1,16,500 as some of the deposited amount had been paid to him. However, he states that the suit was filed for the recovery of the principal amount alongwith the profit and was also decreed as such. Mr. Muhammad Nazar Khan states that so far the claim in respect of the principal amount only has been registered by the Board of Administrators under the orders of the Lahore High Court for the principal amount of various parties alone is almost Rs,250 crores. He, however, states that if and when the amount of profit of other parties is also taken into consideration by the Board the plaintiff/decreeholder's case will also be considered.
3. ' Mr. Muhammad Nazar Khan also states that an application has been made in Suit No, 1042/90 for the setting aside of the ex parte decree, and therefore he requests that the present execution application may, in any case, be adjourned till the disposal of the application. Even otherwise, he states that the case of the decree-holder has been registered by the Board of the J.D. Company.
4. ' In the circumstances, this application alongwith the documents filed therewith may be kept on record and Execution application is adjourned to be taken up after the disposal of the application filed by the J.D. In the aforesaid Suit No, 1042/90 for the setting aside of the ex parte decree.
5. ' CMA-462/92 is disposed of in the above terms.