' This is an application for the concellation of bail of Salamat Ali and Zahid alias Zahid Rashid granted to them by this Court on 24-3-1991.
2. The prosecution case is that the respondents alongwith 3 others committed the murder of Muhammad Akram deceased with fire-arms on 1 30-4-1990. The prosecution version is that on 30- 4-1990 the deceased alongwith his father and others was nearing his car after condoling the death of Muhammad Sadiq's wife when the respondents and their companions attacked the deceased with fire-arms resulting in his death.
3. The respondents were granted bail on the grounds that they had been found innocent by the local police, local D.S.P. And D.S.P., Samundari and that no motive was attributed to them and further that only ineffective firing was attributed to Salamat Ali while Zahid alias Zahid Rashid had allegedly fired at the deceased when he had fallen injured.
4. Cancellation is sought on the grounds that the respondents had been found guilty by the S.P., Range Crimes who had recommended to challan them and further that the respondents are misusing the concession of bail and threatened the P.Ws. About Salamat Ali respondent it is stated that he had misbehaved even with the trial Court as a result of which the Court requested for the transfer of the case from his Court. Bashir Ahmad and Ghulam Mohyud-Din have lodged reports with the police to the above effect.
5. The respondents have denied the allegations. Zahid Rashid has filed a counter-affidavit denying the aforementioned allegations.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account all the circumstances I am of the view that Salamat All is not entitled to remain on bail because he reportedly misbehaved with the trial Court. He has not even cared to file a counter-affidavit. Accordingly I cancel his bail.
However, the application is dismissed to the extent of Zahid alias Zahid Rashid because he has filed a counter-affidavit denying the allegations levelled by the witnesses and there is no such retort that he had misbehaved with the trial Court. The learned trial Court is directed to conclude the case within a month.