The first bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court on 21-1-1991. He has repeated his request. The new ground urged on his behalf is that all the 22 small packets (Purian) of heroin were not sent to the Chemical Examiner for analysis and out of them only two small packets (Purian) were sent to him. According to the learned counsel, only two small packets (Purian), which on chemical analysis were found to contain heroin, will be deemed to be the actionable material recovered from the petitioner in view of the authorities known as PLD 1987 FSC 6 and 1988 P Cr. L J 2069. Further submits that the petitioner was apprehended as far back as 29-11-1990 and not a single prosecution witness has also been examined by the trial Court so far.
2. The previous bail application was based on some other grounds. The ground now pressed into service by the learned counsel for the petitioner is somewhat different. I have my own views about the proposition of law propounded in the aforesaid authorities and shall express the same in some other case.
3. Since about 9 months have elapsed to the arrest and detention of the petitioner and his trial is still at the initial stage, without going into the intricacies of law, I enlarge the petitioner on bail if he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs,15,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.