MIAN ABDUL KHALIQ, J-Contends that the petitioners were summoned by the trial Court in a private complaint filed by the respondent under sections 307,365,511,148,149 PPC. It is contended that the private complaint is a counter blast.
2. The preliminary evidence was recorded by the reader of the Court. The petitioner moved an application under section 249-A.Cr.P.C, which was dismissed by the trial Court vide his impugned order dated 13.3.1991. Thereafter he filed a criminal revision which was also dismissed vide order dated 30.9.1991.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that preliminary evidence was recorded by the reader of the Magistrate which is not warranted under the law.
4. 1 have gone through the attested copy appended with the petition. A certificate has been given by the Magistrate that the evidence was dictated by him in the private complaint. The petitioners have already been summoned and the same is fixed for evidence. No ground for quashment.
Dismissed in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.