Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1993 MLD 2342

MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 2 others vs THE STATE

Citation1993 MLD 2342
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Misc. Application No,182 of 1993
Date1993-04-04
Judge(s)Imam Ali G. Kazi
ResultApplication dismissed

ORDER

1. ' The applicant alongwith two others was sent up by the police to stand trial under sections 323, 325, 147, 148, 34, P.P.C. in the Court of Additional City Magistrate XIII (East), Karachi. In fact this was the counter-case of murder case under F.I.R. No, 110 of 1984 and Sessions Case No, 398 of 1985. The counter-case was forwarded to the Sessions Judge for trial while in the other case the proceedings were stopped by the Magistrate due to non-appearance of the witnesses under section 249, Cr.P.C.

2. ' On an application the Sessions Judge transferred the proceedings of the case to his file and revived it on the application filed by the prosecution.

3. ' The applicants through the present application filed under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. seek quashing of the case which was stopped by the Magistrate and revived by the Sessions Judge as stated above.

4. ' Mr. Jamilur Rehman, Advocate for the applicants, mainly contended that once a case was stopped by the Magistrate it is only the Magistrate who could revive it. The Sessions Judge for that purpose could not act in any manner.

5. ' Mr. Azizur Rehman, Advocate appearing for the Advocate-General Sindh states that the Advocate for the applicants has not justified his case and. he will not support it.

6. Once a case is stopped under section 249, Cr.P.C. it does not by itself, as is clear from the language of the section, terminate the proceedings finally as the case is neither discharged nor acquitted.

7. Under such circumstances proceedings shall be taken to be still pending although an order to stop the proceedings be passed in such a case. The Sessions Judge could transfer such pending proceedings to his file and pass an appropriate order for reviving it. Besides, this is a counter-case of the murder case and it will be only appropriate and fair that both the cases are tried together as otherwise any decision in its case will prejudice the interest of the accused persons in the other case.

8. ' For the foregoing reasons I find no merit in this application and it is dismissed in limine.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch