' In support of this bail application, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that this case was investigated by Umer Farooq, D.S.P., who found the petitioner as well as Riyasat innocent, inasmuch as, he gave finding that the petitioner was away from the scene of occurrence. It is further submitted that the case was reinvestigated by the D.S.P., Sheikhupura who also found that the petitioner and Riyasat were innocent. The learned counsel for the petitioner thus contends that the petitioner deserves the grant of bail. All the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner have been controverted by the learned counsel for the complainant.
2. The learned counsel for the complainant submits that the case was initially investigated by the local S.H.O. who found the petitioner guilty of the commission of offence and not only fatal blow to Basara deceased was attributed to the petitioner, the injuries to the two P.Ws. were also caused by the petitioner and Liaqat and on the basis thereof, a report under section 173, Cr.P.C. was also submitted. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the complainant that the finding given by the two police officers about the innocence of the petitioner are not borne out from the record.
Only two witnesses have appeared in defence of the petitioner and therefore, on the basis of the statements of these two persons, the case cannot be said to be one of further enquiry and thus, the petitioner does not deserve the grant of bail. Furthermore, in the final report under section 173, Cr.P.C. petitioner's name finds mention in column No,3.
3. Having considered all the circumstances of the case, I do not find it a fit case for the grant of bail.
Hence this petition is dismissed.