' ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J.---Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against an order of a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Civil Revision No, 1345 of 1983 dated 6-6-1992.
1. Relevant facts are that the petitioner and respondent No,1 filed declaratory suits which were consolidated and disposed of by a single judgment by the learned Civil Judge, Mandi Bahauddin, District Gujrat vide judgment and decree dated 12-4-1981 whereby the petitioner's suit was dismissed and that of respondent No,1 was decreed. The petitioner filed an appeal which was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, vide judgment and decree dated 7-6-1983. He filed a revision petition which had also been dismissed on the ground that the petitioner had not challenged the decree passed in favour of the respondent vide the consolidated judgment.
2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had filed joint appeal as would appear from its title at page 47 of the Paper Book, where it was prayed for setting aside the judgment and decree and for decreeing of the suit of the appellant and dismissal of the suit of respondent No,1 with costs of both the Courts. He also relies on "Siraj Din and 11 others v. Rajada"
(1992 SCM R 979).
3. To consider the contention leave to appeal is granted. Interim order dated 24-6-1992 to continue. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.