MIR HAZAR KHAN KHOSO, CJ.--The petitioner was convicted for offence under Article 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 11 Quetta on 24-4-1991 and sentenced to suffer R.I. For 10 years, fine of Rs: 10,000/- in default to suffer 6 months R.I. And five stripes. He challenged his conviction and sentence before this Court. By order dated 21-1-1992 this Court dismissed his appeal on merit. However, his sentence was reduced from 10 years R.1, to 3 years R.I. The sentences of fine and whipping were maintained. He was extended benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C., also By this Application he had requested for remission of his sentence on the ground that he is an old man and has passed 1 /3rd of his sentence.
2. It may be observed that the petitioner's appeal has been decided, hence, power under provisions of Offenders Probation Ordinance, 1961 cannot be exercised at this stage. Besides this Court does not have power to review its judgment passed in criminal appeal, It may be further added that this Court does not enjoy powers of section 401 or 402 of Cr.P.C to suspend, remit or commute sentence of a convict. The application is therefore, not maintainable and rejected accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.