' Ghulam Nazir son of Janab Shah, petitioner has challenged the validity of the order having been passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore dated 20-1-1992 in his criminal revision.
Learned Additional Sessions Judge vide his said order upheld the order passed by the learned District Magistrate, Lahore whereby he approved the enquiry report submitted by the learned Magistrate 1st Class dated 28-6-1988 about the ownership of Vehicle No,3072/PRF with its present No,LHH/4552. Learned revisional Court came to the conclusion after hearing the parties that the national identity card of the petitioner and the transfer letter issued in his favour were fake documents. After discussing the entire matter in depth learned Judge dismissed the revision petition of the present petitioner.
2. An objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the complainant and the learned Law Officer that this petition under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. was not competent because the impugned order was passed by the learned Court below under section 435/439, Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the partiei at some length and have also read the impugned order. A clear finding has been given by the learned Additional Sessions Judge that the documents produced and relied upon by the petitioner were not genuine. This being so, the petitioner cannot claim the ownership of the vehicle on the basis of forged documents. Admittedly the custody of the vehicle in question is with Abdul Khaliq, respondent No,1. It is contended by the learned counsel for respondent No,1 that he is bona fide purchaser of the vehicle for valuable consideration. Be that as it may, a finding of fact has been given by the learned Additional Sessions Judge that the national identity card and transfer letter pertaining to the vehicle in question, produced and relied upon by the petitioner were not genuine. There is thus no substance in the petition, which is dismissed.