1. ORDER Mudabbir Ahmad appellant has preferred this appeal against the order, dated 17th May 1973 passed by the Junior Labour Court, Multan whereby his applications for re-instatement and consequential benefits was dismissed. The case of the petitioner-appellant as per his statement recorded in the Junior Labour Court is that he joined the respondent factory as an instrument Technician on 7th August 1972. On 3rd April 1973 he was dismissed from service without any notice or inquiry. On 14th April 1973 he sent a grievance notice to the respondent to which no reply was received. The petitioner further stated that 26 or 27 employees who joined the factory after him are still in service. The respondent contended that the petitioner was purely temporary workman and was deputed on work of temporary nature which was not likely to last beyond 9 months and on completion of the said work his services were terminated strictly in accordance with law. Mr. Muhammad Ikram, Advocate, learned counsel for the appellant has contended that there is no evidence on record to show that the petitioner was hired for a work of temporary nature. The contention seems to have no force. Mr. Rafiq Ahmad Deputy Manager, Labour appearing as R. W. has stated that the services of the petitioner were hired for a work which was not likely to last more than 9 months and his services were terminated on the completion of the said work. This witness was not cross-examined by the appellant and his statement goes unchallenged on the record. It is, therefore, A established that the petitioner-appellant was engaged on work of temporary nature and in this view of the matter no notice was required for terminating bis service. The order of the Junior Labour Court is well-reasoned and calls for no interference. For the foregoing reasons, I find no force in the appeal and it is hereby dismissed.