' This revision petition is directed against the judgment, dated 23-1-1992 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kasur, whereby he acquitted the respondent of the charge of murder.
2. Brief facts relevant for the disposal of this revision petition are that a case under section 302, P.P.C. Was registered against the respondent for the murder of his own wife Mst. Surraya Bibi on the statement of her real brother Amanat Ali (P.W.4).
3. The prosecution in order to prove its case examined twelve witnesses.
' As there was no direct evidence, the learned trial Judge disbelieving the entire prosecution case acquitted the respondent of the charge through the impugned judgment.
4. Learned counsel has assailed the impugned order on the ground that the dead body was found in the house of the accused-respondent and there is last seen evidence furnished by Bashir Ahmad (P.W.4) and Muhammad Hussain (P.W.5). He has also relied upon the evidence of extra- judicial confession given by Abdul Haque (P.W.7). Learned counsel submitted that by gross misreading of evidence, the trial Judge has acquitted the respondent which has resulted into miscarriage of justice.
5. I have carefully perused the record and have heard the learned counsel at length. Admittedly, there is no direct evidence on the record to prove the factum of murder. The statement of the doctor is very evasive and there is no evidence whatsoever on the file how the deceased met her death. The impugned judgment does not suffer from any legal infirmity. The learned trial Judge gave very solid, valid and cogent reasons while coming to the conclusion that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove its case against the accused respondent. Even the learned counsel has failed to point out any gross misreading of evidence; hence there is no force in this petition, which is dismissed in limine.