1. ' Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the complainant have come to some understanding about the speedy conclusion of the trial against the accused. Learned counsel for the complainant states that he has no objection to the grant of bail to the petitioner provided a specific direction is given to the learned trial Judge to conclude the trial against the accused as early as possible. This offer has been accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He says that he will not press the bail petition of the co-accused (Cr. Misc. No.690-B of 1992) Muhammad Jamil and 7 others v. The State in case the petitioner Akhtar Abbas is released on bail. The learned counsel has given the assurance that the accused shall give full co-operation to the learned trial Court for concluding the trial against them at an early date. He has given an undertaking that no request for adjournment of the trial shall be made by the accused under any circumstances. In the circumstances the petitioner Akhtar Abbas shall remain on bail provided he furnishes security in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, within the next three days.
2. In view of the statements of the learned counsel for the parties, the trial against the accused shall commence on 20-6-1992 and it shall continue on day-to-day basis till such time it is brought to an end. This petitions is accordingly disposed of. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.