1. ' The facts leading to the filing of pre-arrest bail are that a case under section 11/7/1979, Islamic Law stands registered against the petitioner with Police Station Lassar Kalan, District Narowal. Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail with the assertion that he has married the alleged abductee Mst. Asia Bibi, therefore, no offence whatsoever is made out.
2. ' It was contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that said Mst. Asia Bibi is sui juris and was competent to enter into marriage which has duly been registered and, in such circumstances, no offence whatsoever has been committed by the petitioner, therefore, he is entitled to the concession of bail.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The alleged abductee was recovered wherein she made a statement levelling allegations of Zina against the petitioner and otheRs, She has not accepted the factum of marriage with the petitioner.
3. In view of the statement of the alleged abductee the contention of the petitioner loses its significance that petitioner had filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights which has since been decreed. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R. He is alleged to have committed Zina with the alleged abductee who has levelled these allegations. He has also not supported the factum of marriage.
4. No ground for pre-arrest bail is made out. Resultantly, petition fails which is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.