' NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.---In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the decision of the respondent authority cancelling the plot in question which had been purchased by the petitioner from the original allottee and which transfer had been approved by the Defence Authority. Mr. Raja M. Irshad, learned counsel for the respondent authority; submits that the cancellation order is being withdrawn as, prior to taking adverse action against the petitioner in respect of the plot in question, no show-cause notice and hearing had been granted to the petitioner.
2. Constitutional Petition No,D-653 of 1985 is accordingly allowed and the order, cancelling the plot of the petitioner in question, is set aside on the ground that before taking such action no prior show-cause notice and hearing was granted to the petitioner. If any action is proposed to be taken by the respondent authority against the petitioner in respect of the plot, a prior show-cause notice giving full facts and the grounds, on which cancellation is intended, shall be given and thereafter full opportunity will be granted to the petitioner to place his case before the Defence Authority and only after fulfilling such formalities, action shall be taken by the respondent authority.
3. The petitioner shall also be entitled to costs against the respondent. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.