1. According to the learned counsel a cognizable offence has been committed by the accused.
2. Learned counsel argues that an information was conveyed to the concerned S.H.O. In that behalf but no action has so far been taken by him against the accused. Learned Additional Advocate- General opposes the petition tooth and nail. He argues that a criminal case has already been registered against the mother-in-law of petitioners under Articles 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 vide F.I.R. No.71 on 21-2-1991. According to the learned counsel the petition in hand is just a counterblast to the case having been registered against the mother- in-law of the petitioner. Be that as it may, there is nothing on the record to show that in fact petitioner has made some complaint against the accused before the higher police officer for the redressal of his grievance. In this view of the matter, petitioner if so advised, may approach Superintendent of Police, Jhang who shall entertain the grievance petition of the petitioner for its disposal on merits according to law. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of