' RUSTAM S. SIDHWA, J.---This is a petition by Shaheen Akbar and others, petitioners, seeking leave to appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dismissing C.M. No,960 of 1991 (filed in I.CA.
No,7 of 1991) and refusing to restrain the respondents from interfering with the possession of the acquired lands still alleged to be with the petitioners.
2. During arguments the parties arrived at a compromise, -which they have filed. The said compromise bears the signatures of both the learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No,1. The same reads as follows:- ' That the parties have mutually agreed that without prejudice to their respective rights in the High Court in I.C.A. 7 of 1991 (now pending) the petitioners will not be disturbed from their possession of Dairy Farm and a house existing in Khasra No,69. (4 Kanals and 7 Marlas), Khasra No,70 (5 Kanals and 1 Marla) and Khasra No,71 (a house in 1 Kanal and 2 Marlas) by the respondents till the final decision of the ' said ICA. This agreement covers an area of 10 Kanals and 10 Marlas.
3. In view of the above, this petition is converted into an appeal and the same is disposed of in terms of the agreement arrived at between the parties, as stated above. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.