AJMAL MIAN; C.J.---One of the points in issue is as to the legality of the amendments in the bye- laws of the Societies made by the Sindh Cooperative Housing Authority in exercise of powers contained under Ordinance V of 1982. The above point has been adjudicated upon by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Hashmatullah v. Sindh Cooperative Housing Authority and others (CT. No,D-934/83), decided on 30th May, 1989, in which it has been held that the Sindh Cooperative Housing Authority has no such power to amend the bye-laws of a Society. We would, therefore, follow the above judgment on the above point and would take the same view.
2. As regards the cancellation of the allotment of plots, the grievance of the petitioners is that the same was done without any notice and without hearing them. In C.P. No,D-972 of 1984 (Abdul Rehman v. PECH Society and others) and C.P. No,D-980 of 1984 (Usman Ali Issani v. PECH Society and others), a Division Bench of this Court disposed of the petitions by consent order. In subsequent 4 petitions, namely, C.P. No,D-304 of 1985, D-305 of 1985, D-375 of 1985, and D- 376/1985, we followed the above consent order and disposed of the above petitions on 27-11-1989 in terms thereof. We would dispose of the above petitions in terms of the above orders, namely:-- "(i) That both the parties shall maintain status quo as obtaining today, and
(ii) That respondent No,1 after hearing the petitioners will decide the question, whether the petitioners' cases were covered by the recommendation of the Enquiry Committee and, whether any action is warranted keeping in view the facts of the cases and principles of . Natural justice.
(iii) The petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs."