DECISION ' This is an appeal against the order of the learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No, 1 at Karachi, dated 8-11-1990, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed.
2. I have heard Mr. Gohar Iqbal, learned counsel for the appellant and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case.
3. The appellant claims to have been orally dismissed from service, for which, after serving grievance notice upon the respondents, the appellant filed grievance petition. The respondents contended that he was not dismissed, but continued to be in service. They however contended that they have charge-sheeted the appellant for remaining absent, but the appellant has been avoiding to face the enquiry. The learned Labour Court came to the conclusion that the appellant failed to prove that he was orally removed from service. The appellant therefore continues to be in service of the respondents and as such would be entitled to all the benefits admissible to him. He is however directed to present himself before the respondents for resumption of duty and to face the enquiry. The question of payment of dues or back benefits if any would depend upon the result of the enquiry.
4. With this observation, the appeal is dismissed in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.